A Killing in the Ratings

Thou shalt not kill was a simple cosmic commandment when the headman of a wandering Bronze Age tribe chiseled it into stone and presented it to his skeptical followers several millennia ago.

And even though that primal prime directive hasn’t seemed to have made a practical impression across centuries of slaughter, it’s always been a persistent crowd pleaser, at least judging by the edict’s countless appearances in our philosophies, laws, and Sunday sermons.

The Hebrews were certainly not the first or last group to advance such a common sense admonishment against the taking of human life; almost every social structure has copped to the idea in theory, if not in practice. Perhaps the problem in making the precept stick is that even such a simple rule is not immune to the foibles and failings of human interpretation, qualification, dispensation, and exemption.

One blatant and bloody exception from the no-no against killing is given to combatants during wartime. As a species, we’ve hacked, burned, bludgeoned, stabbed, speared, shot, and blasted our way across several continents and thousands of years without much regard for the dictate of any Higher Being. In fact, during those frequently reoccurring times of militant feeding frenzy, we’re encouraged to hate our enemies and given special permission by our earthly authorities to waste whoever happens to be on the wrong end of our gun barrels and beneath our bomb bay doors.

Another novel interpretation is presented by the religious right when they seize upon the dictum against murder as reason to deny some citizens the right to choose whether or not to bring another consumer into this hungry, overcrowded, and increasingly threadbare world. Abortion is murder, they say, and then proceed to murder anyone who dares to practice what is essentially a legal, medical procedure. Both sides of the debate continue their contributions to the body count.

Still another exemption took place recently in the great state of Texas when they snuffed a woman even though she found God while she waited to be killed by the followers of the very same god who commanded them not to. Although it would appear the principal reason for injecting the lethal brew into her veins was simply that she was a woman and Texas wanted to support equal treatment of the ladies in the matter of capital punishment. The issue became one of women’s rights and not the morality of murder by execution.

However hypocritical, conflicting, contradictory and downright blasphemous abortion, capital punishment and war may be, they have often superseded the basic edict from our Higher Self for as long as we have existed as reasoning creatures.

Maybe abortion is murder and should be outlawed as a method of birth control. It’s not as if we don’t already have several other more humane, if not more effective, preventive methods.

Maybe war is a necessary evil to ward off an even greater evil. Aren’t the means sometimes justified by the end even if those lethal means result in countries populated by widows and orphans?

And maybe, if the horror stories in the media are any indication, there truly are murderous monsters lurking in our society who may well deserve a permanent removal from our midst.

Which brings me to my point at last: The popular rationale used by many proponents is that capital punishment is a deterrent to murder (despite the grim reality of continuing high murder rates). So, perhaps we should put the theory to the test by making executions public. How can a deterrent deter if no one sees the deterrent?

When we shock, shoot, hang, poison, gas, behead, stone, crucify, or otherwise snuff our major miscreants, let all citizens young and old be afforded the opportunity to see the deed done. After all, we televise our wars and even video tape abortions. And if the O.J. circus, the Princess Di death orgy, and the presidential peccadillos are any indications, the television networks should jump at any kind of novel prime time spectacles to capture viewers and boost ratings. What better than nationally televised executions?

As we sit before our tubes and watch the smoke curl from the ears of an electrified skull, follow an instant replay of extremities dancing to the terminal tug of the gallows noose, capture VCR images of bullets ripping apart fragile flesh and bone, listen to a narrator count each deadly drop as it trickles into a failing heart, we might all observe what could happen if we violate the sacred sanction against killing.

If even that graphic lesson fails to make an impression, at the very least, it might cause us to ponder the paradox surrounding our convenient suspension of this very simple, very old, and very neglected commandment.

Copyright ©1997 by Russ Moritz. All rights reserved

  Table of Contents        Back to Home Page